Crypto & Web3·Jun 21, 2026

BnbLabubu exploit drains $1.1mln after OLPC reserve mismatch – Details

Another day, another exploit. On the 20th of June, an attacker stole approximately $1.11 million worth of assets. This was done by taking advantage of the OLPC/LABUBU liquidity pool on PancakeSwap V2 on the BNB Chain. The attack exploited a

AMB Crypto2 min readSingle source
BnbLabubu exploit drains $1.1mln after OLPC reserve mismatch – Details
Image · AMB Crypto
The gist
5-point summary · 1 min

Another day, another exploit. On the 20th of June, an attacker stole approximately $1.11 million worth of assets. This was done by taking advantage of the OLPC/LABUBU liquidity pool on PancakeSwap V2 on the BNB Chain. The attack exploited a

  • On the 20th of June, an attacker stole approximately $1.11 million worth of assets.
  • However, preliminary analysis suggested the exploit may have stemmed from a previously modified decimalsValue parameter in the OLPC contract.
  • Attacks in June With another exploit, the total value of hacks in June to date has reached $60.03 million, according to DeFiLlama data.
  • Source: DeFiLlama This coincided with Humanity Protocol [H] experiencing a significant exploit, which caused losses of about $32 million.
  • Additionally, UXLink, which was targeted back in September 2025, recently witnessed the attacker transferring approximately $8.1 million in Ethereum into Tornado Cash.
$1$1.11 million$60.03 million$32 million$8.1 millionSeptember 2025
In this article

Another day, another exploit. On the 20th of June, an attacker stole approximately $1.11 million worth of assets. This was done by taking advantage of the OLPC/LABUBU liquidity pool on PancakeSwap V2 on the BNB Chain. The attack exploited a flaw in how the pool’s constant-product market maker interacted with OLPC’s deflationary mechanism. While the pair’s cached reserves remained unchanged, its actual token balances collapsed after a small transfer from the attacker’s contract. That transfer triggered the burn of roughly 51.9 million OLPC and 124,000 LABUBU tokens from the pool to a dead address. Further details of the attack The reserve mismatch created a severe pricing distortion. As a result, the attacker bought and drained the remaining LABUBU at heavily discounted prices. At the time of writing, it remained unclear whether the vulnerability had been intentionally introduced long before the attack. However, preliminary analysis suggested the exploit may have stemmed from a previously modified decimalsValue parameter in the OLPC contract. How did this vulnerability originate? A more in-depth analysis suggests that this exploit appears to have stemmed from a long-standing flaw in the OLPC token. About 46 days before the attack, the token owner changed the decimalsValue parameter from 1 to an enormous number. This enabled excessive token burns through the _update() function. The incident has also raised suspicions. Weeks before ownership was renounced, the OLPC contract’s decimalsValue had already been set to an unusually high level. That timing suggested the flaw may have been embedded long before the exploit occurred. Notably, there have been no reports of the stolen funds moving to other chains, entering Tornado Cash, or being distributed across multiple wallets. Attacks in June With another exploit, the total value of hacks in June to date has reached $60.03 million, according to DeFiLlama data. Source: DeFiLlama This coincided with Humanity Protocol [H] experiencing a significant exploit, which caused losses of about $32 million. Aztec Network saw yet another notable exploit resulting in the drainage of 1,158 Ethereum [ETH], 150,000 DAI, and 0.4696 renBTC. Additionally, UXLink, which was targeted back in September 2025, recently witnessed the attacker transferring approximately $8.1 million in Ethereum into Tornado Cash. Final Summary The attack took advantage of a reserve desynchronization vulnerability brought on by the deflationary mechanisms of the OLPC token. Before exchanging the profits, the attacker was able to drain LABUBU liquidity at advantageous rates due to the resulting pricing distortion.

Integrity note  ·  Xela does not rewrite or paraphrase article content. The excerpt above is the source publication's own words, sanitized for display. For the full piece — including any quotes, charts, or images — read it at AMB Crypto. Xela's rewritten version is off for this story, so there's no editorial angle attached — you're getting the source's reporting unfiltered. When the rewrite is on, we add a What this means block underneath with the operator/trader takeaway.

What people are saying

Discussion

Hot takes

0/280

Loading takes…

Comments

Discussion · 0

Sign in to comment, like, and save articles.

Sign in

Loading comments…

Keep readingCrypto & Web3 desk
See all in Crypto
Newsletter

Track crypto & web3 every morning.

Daily digest tuned to this beat. The 5 stories most worth your time. Unsubscribe anytime.