Crypto & Web3·May 19, 2026

Elizabeth Warren questions OCC on 9 crypto bank charters

Senator Elizabeth Warren, a member of the US Senate Banking Committee, has raised concerns over the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) approval of “trust charter” licenses granted to nine crypto-focused institutions. Warren c

CoinTurk News3 min readSingle source
Elizabeth Warren questions OCC on 9 crypto bank charters
Image · CoinTurk News
The gist
5-point summary · 1 min

Senator Elizabeth Warren, a member of the US Senate Banking Committee, has raised concerns over the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) approval of “trust charter” licenses granted to nine crypto-focused institutions. Warren c

  • Senator Elizabeth Warren, a member of the US Senate Banking Committee, has raised concerns over the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) approval of “trust charter” licenses granted to nine crypto-focused institutions.
  • However, in a letter to OCC head Jonathan Gould, Warren demanded a comprehensive explanation of these approvals.Warren argues that the firms in question are attempting to avoid the core safeguards and responsibilities required in mainstream banking.
  • Trump era and political contextIn her letter of complaint, Warren also requested disclosure of any communications between the OCC, former President Donald Trump, or his family regarding the granting of these trust charters.
  • She has consistently criticized the OCC’s relationship with World Liberty Financial Inc., a company in which the Trump family reportedly holds shares.Awaiting response from the OCCThe OCC has yet to comment publicly on Senator Warren’s formal request.
  • Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.
In this article

Senator Elizabeth Warren, a member of the US Senate Banking Committee, has raised concerns over the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) approval of “trust charter” licenses granted to nine crypto-focused institutions. Warren claims these companies do not comply with federal regulations and pose a significant risk to the financial system.Scrutiny of regulatory processDebate over trust charters and complianceTrump era and political contextAwaiting response from the OCC Scrutiny of regulatory processDuring the Trump administration, the OCC authorized trust charters for Coinbase, Paxos, Ripple, BitGo, and Fidelity Digital Asset Services, among others, allowing these crypto-linked companies to engage in banking activities. The agency, at the time, adopted a more favorable regulatory stance toward the crypto industry. However, in a letter to OCC head Jonathan Gould, Warren demanded a comprehensive explanation of these approvals.Warren argues that the firms in question are attempting to avoid the core safeguards and responsibilities required in mainstream banking. She further alleges that the OCC’s licensing approach violates federal laws and warned that decisions taken present major risks for consumers, the security of the banking system, and the separation of banking from commerce.These companies are essentially crypto banks and want to sidestep the fundamental responsibilities of being a bank. By supporting this kind of regulatory loophole, the agency is not only violating federal law but also creating serious risks for consumers, the security of the banking system, and the crucial distinction between banking and commerce.Debate over trust charters and complianceCrypto-based firms have leaned toward operating under trust company charters—seen as less stringent compared to full national bank licenses—so as to avoid tougher regulations. Warren emphasizes that these companies behave less like traditional trust firms and more like conventional banks, especially since their business models revolve around services like asset custody, payments facilitation, lending, and stablecoin transactions. Trump era and political contextIn her letter of complaint, Warren also requested disclosure of any communications between the OCC, former President Donald Trump, or his family regarding the granting of these trust charters. She has consistently criticized the OCC’s relationship with World Liberty Financial Inc., a company in which the Trump family reportedly holds shares.Awaiting response from the OCCThe OCC has yet to comment publicly on Senator Warren’s formal request. Whether the regulatory body will issue an explanation remains an open question and is being closely observed.The crux of Warren’s concern is that crypto institutions may seek to benefit from banking privileges without satisfying the key regulatory requirements intended to ensure consumer protections and financial stability.She maintains that by utilizing trust charters, these companies can avoid the full scrutiny and oversight imposed on national banks, potentially exposing the financial system to novel hazards.Moreover, Warren claims that the ambiguity in regulatory definitions could encourage further risk-taking in the sector if left unaddressed by federal authorities.This latest inquiry reflects an ongoing debate in Washington over how best to regulate the rapidly evolving interface between traditional banking and cryptocurrency services.For now, the spotlight remains on the OCC, with industry experts and lawmakers, including Warren, seeking clearer regulatory lines and further transparency over the process of granting banking privileges to crypto firms.Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.

Integrity note  ·  Xela does not rewrite or paraphrase article content. The excerpt above is the source publication's own words, sanitized for display. For the full piece — including any quotes, charts, or images — read it at CoinTurk News. Xela's rewritten version is off for this story, so there's no editorial angle attached — you're getting the source's reporting unfiltered. When the rewrite is on, we add a What this means block underneath with the operator/trader takeaway.

What people are saying

Discussion

Hot takes

0/280

Loading takes…

Comments

Discussion · 0

Sign in to comment, like, and save articles.

Sign in

Loading comments…

Keep readingCrypto & Web3 desk
See all in Crypto
Bitcoin analysis shows what bulls need to do next to end this bearish 2026
·

Bitcoin analysis shows what bulls need to do next to end this bearish 2026

Bitcoin stabilizes near $63,000, but reclaiming $64,000 is the real test Bitcoin is stabilizing near $63,100 after buyers defended the lower part of its recent range. That is constructive, but it is not yet a confirmed recovery. BTC must first overcome resistance near $63,175-$63,270, while reclaiming and holding $64,000-$64,095 remains the more important test. Key takeaways for Bitcoin traders and investors Current position: BTC is holding above the previous month’s lower value boundary near $62,380. Immediate resistance: Buyers need to clear $63,130-$63,175, followed by $63,247-$63,270. Main recovery test: A sustained reclaim of $64,000-$64,095 would carry much more weight than a temporary bounce near $63,000. Major support: The broader $62,380-$62,535 region remains the most important defended zone. Bullish confirmation: Repeated closes, consolidation or a successful retest above $64,095 would show that Bitcoin is beginning to establish higher accepted value. Data note: The latest daily, four-hour and one-hour candles were incomplete when this analysis was prepared. Exchange-specific Bitcoin prices may also differ slightly. I'm also closely monitoring the digital asset space after , putting immediate pressure on lower order-flow shelves as bulls fight to defend structural trendlines. Regulatory headwinds also resurfaced as the , injecting fresh institutional hesitation into active trading books. Meanwhile, broader risk sentiment showed divergence across asset classes as , underscoring rotational breadth away from mega-cap tech into small-cap momentum. Macro headwinds and geopolitical posturing remain front and center following headline chatter that , all while monetary policy uncertainty lingers after amidst baseline model variances. Why Bitcoin’s stabilization is constructive but incomplete Bitcoin recently fell to approximately $62,535, where the decline attracted meaningful buying. Price subsequently recovered toward $63,100, strengthening the case that buyers are willing to defend the lower part of the previous month’s trading range. What stands out to me, however, is how little upward progress followed that buying. Several periods showed positive buying pressure, but BTC remained concentrated around $63,050 and repeatedly struggled to extend beyond $63,150-$63,175. In simple terms, buyers have shown that they can slow the decline, but they have not yet shown that they can move Bitcoin into a clearly higher trading range. This is the difference between stabilization and recovery: Stabilization means sellers are no longer pushing price lower with the same ease. Recovery means buyers are lifting price, holding above resistance and shifting the market’s most active trading area higher. Bitcoin has shown the first condition. The second still needs confirmation. Why $62,380 and $64,095 matter The previous month’s value area provides a useful map of where most Bitcoin trading took place: Value Area Low near $62,380: The lower boundary of the previous month’s heavily traded range. Point of Control near $64,095: The price that attracted the most trading activity during the month. Value Area High near $65,050: The upper boundary of the previous month’s accepted range. BTC is currently about $720 above the monthly Value Area Low, but almost $1,000 below the monthly Point of Control. Holding above $62,380 tells us that demand inside the previous month’s range has not completely failed. Remaining below $64,095 tells us that buyers have not regained control of the broader value structure. This is also why $64,095 may be more important than $64,000 itself. The round number attracts attention, but $64,095 represents the previous month’s busiest price area. A brief move above $64,000 could still become another failed breakout. Holding above $64,095 would provide stronger evidence that the market is accepting higher prices again. As discussed in our previous analysis, Bitcoin’s created technical repair work for buyers. That repair is not complete simply because BTC has bounced from $62,535. Bitcoin support and resistance levels to watch What would strengthen the bullish Bitcoin scenario? Swing traders should have 3 key price levels: The Value Area Low (VAL), Point of Control (POC) and Value Area High (VAH) of the previous month. Together, these levels map the previous month’s main area of accepted trading: the VAL marks its lower boundary, the VAH its upper boundary, and the POC the price where the most volume traded. Traders watch them because holding inside the area suggests continued acceptance, while a sustained break outside it may signal that the market is searching for a new value zone. The first constructive step would be sustained trade above $63,175. Buyers would then need to clear and hold above $63,247-$63,270. That would improve the probability of a move toward $63,350 and, eventually, the much larger $64,000-$64,095 test. A more convincing recovery would include: Bitcoin reclaiming $64,000. Price moving above the monthly point of control near $64,095. A pullback successfully defending the reclaimed area. Trading activity beginning to concentrate above $64,095 rather than immediately slipping back below it. If that sequence develops, approximately $65,050 becomes the next major value-area objective. What this means: Acceptance is more than touching a level. It means price spends time above it, survives pullbacks and begins treating the higher area as support. What would weaken the stabilization attempt? Failure to hold $62,920-$62,800 would weaken the current short-term base and increase the probability of another test of $62,535. The more serious bearish development would be sustained trade below $62,380. That would place BTC outside the previous month’s accepted value area and suggest that the market may need to search for demand at lower prices. Traders should still distinguish between a brief move below $62,380 and genuine acceptance beneath it. Crypto markets can produce fast stop-runs through visible support before reversing. Repeated closes or continued trading below the level would carry more bearish significance than a momentary sweep. What Bitcoin traders may consider watching Different traders may use these levels in different ways, at their own discretion: Short-term breakout confirmation: Watch whether BTC can break above $63,175 and successfully retest it, with $63,247-$63,270 providing the next validation area. Support-zone reaction: If BTC returns to $62,380-$62,535, watch whether buyers defend it again or whether selling begins to hold below the zone. Broader recovery confirmation: Treat $64,000-$64,095 as the decisive recovery test instead of assuming that every bounce from $63,000 marks a durable bottom. Because Bitcoin trades continuously, weekend conditions can sometimes involve thinner liquidity and less reliable breakouts. Confirmation through time, repeated closes or a successful retest may therefore be more useful than reacting to the first price spike. What should Bitcoin traders watch next? Bitcoin has defended the lower part of the previous month’s value area, but the rebound still needs to prove itself. The immediate challenge is to move beyond $63,175 and $63,270. The much larger test remains $64,000-$64,095. A successful reclaim would indicate that Bitcoin is returning toward the center of the previous month’s accepted value rather than merely bouncing from support. Until that happens, Bitcoin may be stabilizing, but it is not yet showing a fully confirmed bullish recovery. This analysis presents conditional market scenarios and opinions (not promises) at investingLive.com, not a guarantee of future performance. Traders should consider volatility, position size and their own risk limits before acting. This article was written by Itai Levitan at investinglive.com.

ForexliveSingle source
Newsletter

Track crypto & web3 every morning.

Daily digest tuned to this beat. The 5 stories most worth your time. Unsubscribe anytime.