Crypto & Web3·May 21, 2026

Terraform Accuses Jane Street of Using Insider Telegram Group Ahead of $40B UST-LUNA Collapse

New allegations claim that Jane Street made use of a private backchannel with Terraform insiders before Terra's collapse.

Decrypt4 min readVerified
Terraform Accuses Jane Street of Using Insider Telegram Group Ahead of $40B UST-LUNA Collapse
Image · Decrypt
The gist
3-point summary · 1 min

New allegations claim that Jane Street made use of a private backchannel with Terraform insiders before Terra's collapse.

  • In brief Terraform Labs' administrator has alleged in an amended complaint that Jane Street used a secret Telegram chat to receive insider information from Terraform employees before Terra’s collapse.
  • The complaint claims Jane Street dumped its entire $192 million TerraUSD position on May 7, 2022, hours before the stablecoin lost its peg.
  • The alleged trades came ahead of the $40 billion Terra implosion, which later sparked a broader crypto contagion, leading to bankruptcy for multiple firms.
$40B$192 million$40 billion$134 million$60May 2022

In brief Terraform Labs' administrator has alleged in an amended complaint that Jane Street used a secret Telegram chat to receive insider information from Terraform employees before Terra’s collapse. The complaint claims Jane Street dumped its entire $192 million TerraUSD position on May 7, 2022, hours before the stablecoin lost its peg. The alleged trades came ahead of the $40 billion Terra implosion, which later sparked a broader crypto contagion, leading to bankruptcy for multiple firms. Terraform Labs administrator Todd Snyder has alleged in an amended complaint filed Monday that Jane Street traders used a private chat to obtain insider information from Terraform employees, before dumping the firm’s entire $192 million TerraUSD position hours before the stablecoin’s collapse.Snyder, the court-appointed Terraform Labs plan administrator, accused quantitative trading firm Jane Street, co-founder Robert Granieri, and traders Bryce Pratt and Michael Huang of insider trading and shorting Terra tokens during the $40 billion crash in May 2022.The filing alleges Jane Street's traders created a “secret message chain” involving current and former employees of Terraform, named “Bryce’s Secret” after Pratt, a former Terraform intern who later joined Jane Street as a systems developer.The amended complaint expands on a lawsuit Snyder first filed in February, marking the second major case brought by Terraform's wind-down trust against a high-frequency trading firm tied to the ecosystem's implosion.Jane Street moved to dismiss the original suit in April, arguing it was a meritless attempt by Terraform's bankruptcy estate to shift blame for the collapse.According to the latest complaint, the chat was created on February 22, 2022, between Pratt and two former Terraform colleagues, including Terraform's Head of Business Development.One participant told Pratt in the chat, "bro we all know who the buyer is. its where u work," before naming "Jane Streeeeeeeet,” as per the filing.The document alleges Pratt continued tapping his Terraform contacts for "defi info" that Jane Street was "very hungry for," often sending requests via Telegram with the instruction "don't share pls."On May 7, 2022, Jane Street unstaked and sold its entire 192 million UST position in a single day, all effectively at the dollar peg, just hours before the stablecoin began its collapse, according to the complaint.The filing alleges Jane Street later shorted UST and Luna after learning details of a confidential rescue effort, ultimately making more than $134 million across the trades.It also alleges Jane Street later attempted to "minimize this kind of visibility going forward" by decommissioning wallets tied to the trades after a Blocktower contact told the firm a group skilled at onchain analytics had concluded Jane Street "made a 'killing'" on its activity.“This suit is a transparent attempt to extract money when it is well-established that the losses suffered by Terra and Luna holders were the result of a multi-billion dollar fraud perpetrated by the management of Terraform Labs," a Jane Street spokesperson told Decrypt. They added that, "As demonstrated in the motion to dismiss filed in court last month, we will defend ourselves vigorously against these baseless, opportunistic claims."Decrypt has reached out to the Terraform Labs wind-down trust for comment.Nic Puckrin, macro analyst and co-founder of Coin Bureau, told Decrypt that insider trading remains especially difficult to police in crypto because “the lines between market-making, privileged information flows and informal communication channels have historically been more blurred.”Still, he noted crypto has one major advantage over traditional finance: “transparent on-chain data.”“That level of visibility can make it much easier for investigators to trace flows of funds, trading patterns, and wallet activity” in order to prove or disprove allegations, Puckrin added.The Terra collapseTerraform collapsed in May 2022 after the TerraUSD algorithmic stablecoin lost its dollar peg, sending sister token LUNA from above $60 to fractions of a cent within days.The roughly $40 billion Terra implosion unleashed a crypto contagion that toppled major firms, including Celsius, Three Arrows Capital, Voyager, and eventually FTX, while erasing trillions in market value.Terraform sought Chapter 11 protection in Delaware in January 2024, and a wind-down trust was later established to pursue recoveries on behalf of creditors.Co-founder Do Kwon, extradited from Montenegro to face U.S. charges, pleaded guilty to conspiracy and wire fraud in December and is now serving a 15-year prison sentence.Daily Debrief NewsletterStart every day with the top news stories right now, plus original features, a podcast, videos and more.

Integrity note  ·  Xela does not rewrite or paraphrase article content. The excerpt above is the source publication's own words, sanitized for display. For the full piece — including any quotes, charts, or images — read it at Decrypt. Xela's rewritten version is off for this story, so there's no editorial angle attached — you're getting the source's reporting unfiltered. When the rewrite is on, we add a What this means block underneath with the operator/trader takeaway.

What people are saying

Discussion

Hot takes

0/280

Loading takes…

Comments

Discussion · 0

Sign in to comment, like, and save articles.

Sign in

Loading comments…

Keep readingCrypto & Web3 desk
See all in Crypto
Bitcoin analysis shows what bulls need to do next to end this bearish 2026
·

Bitcoin analysis shows what bulls need to do next to end this bearish 2026

Bitcoin stabilizes near $63,000, but reclaiming $64,000 is the real test Bitcoin is stabilizing near $63,100 after buyers defended the lower part of its recent range. That is constructive, but it is not yet a confirmed recovery. BTC must first overcome resistance near $63,175-$63,270, while reclaiming and holding $64,000-$64,095 remains the more important test. Key takeaways for Bitcoin traders and investors Current position: BTC is holding above the previous month’s lower value boundary near $62,380. Immediate resistance: Buyers need to clear $63,130-$63,175, followed by $63,247-$63,270. Main recovery test: A sustained reclaim of $64,000-$64,095 would carry much more weight than a temporary bounce near $63,000. Major support: The broader $62,380-$62,535 region remains the most important defended zone. Bullish confirmation: Repeated closes, consolidation or a successful retest above $64,095 would show that Bitcoin is beginning to establish higher accepted value. Data note: The latest daily, four-hour and one-hour candles were incomplete when this analysis was prepared. Exchange-specific Bitcoin prices may also differ slightly. I'm also closely monitoring the digital asset space after , putting immediate pressure on lower order-flow shelves as bulls fight to defend structural trendlines. Regulatory headwinds also resurfaced as the , injecting fresh institutional hesitation into active trading books. Meanwhile, broader risk sentiment showed divergence across asset classes as , underscoring rotational breadth away from mega-cap tech into small-cap momentum. Macro headwinds and geopolitical posturing remain front and center following headline chatter that , all while monetary policy uncertainty lingers after amidst baseline model variances. Why Bitcoin’s stabilization is constructive but incomplete Bitcoin recently fell to approximately $62,535, where the decline attracted meaningful buying. Price subsequently recovered toward $63,100, strengthening the case that buyers are willing to defend the lower part of the previous month’s trading range. What stands out to me, however, is how little upward progress followed that buying. Several periods showed positive buying pressure, but BTC remained concentrated around $63,050 and repeatedly struggled to extend beyond $63,150-$63,175. In simple terms, buyers have shown that they can slow the decline, but they have not yet shown that they can move Bitcoin into a clearly higher trading range. This is the difference between stabilization and recovery: Stabilization means sellers are no longer pushing price lower with the same ease. Recovery means buyers are lifting price, holding above resistance and shifting the market’s most active trading area higher. Bitcoin has shown the first condition. The second still needs confirmation. Why $62,380 and $64,095 matter The previous month’s value area provides a useful map of where most Bitcoin trading took place: Value Area Low near $62,380: The lower boundary of the previous month’s heavily traded range. Point of Control near $64,095: The price that attracted the most trading activity during the month. Value Area High near $65,050: The upper boundary of the previous month’s accepted range. BTC is currently about $720 above the monthly Value Area Low, but almost $1,000 below the monthly Point of Control. Holding above $62,380 tells us that demand inside the previous month’s range has not completely failed. Remaining below $64,095 tells us that buyers have not regained control of the broader value structure. This is also why $64,095 may be more important than $64,000 itself. The round number attracts attention, but $64,095 represents the previous month’s busiest price area. A brief move above $64,000 could still become another failed breakout. Holding above $64,095 would provide stronger evidence that the market is accepting higher prices again. As discussed in our previous analysis, Bitcoin’s created technical repair work for buyers. That repair is not complete simply because BTC has bounced from $62,535. Bitcoin support and resistance levels to watch What would strengthen the bullish Bitcoin scenario? Swing traders should have 3 key price levels: The Value Area Low (VAL), Point of Control (POC) and Value Area High (VAH) of the previous month. Together, these levels map the previous month’s main area of accepted trading: the VAL marks its lower boundary, the VAH its upper boundary, and the POC the price where the most volume traded. Traders watch them because holding inside the area suggests continued acceptance, while a sustained break outside it may signal that the market is searching for a new value zone. The first constructive step would be sustained trade above $63,175. Buyers would then need to clear and hold above $63,247-$63,270. That would improve the probability of a move toward $63,350 and, eventually, the much larger $64,000-$64,095 test. A more convincing recovery would include: Bitcoin reclaiming $64,000. Price moving above the monthly point of control near $64,095. A pullback successfully defending the reclaimed area. Trading activity beginning to concentrate above $64,095 rather than immediately slipping back below it. If that sequence develops, approximately $65,050 becomes the next major value-area objective. What this means: Acceptance is more than touching a level. It means price spends time above it, survives pullbacks and begins treating the higher area as support. What would weaken the stabilization attempt? Failure to hold $62,920-$62,800 would weaken the current short-term base and increase the probability of another test of $62,535. The more serious bearish development would be sustained trade below $62,380. That would place BTC outside the previous month’s accepted value area and suggest that the market may need to search for demand at lower prices. Traders should still distinguish between a brief move below $62,380 and genuine acceptance beneath it. Crypto markets can produce fast stop-runs through visible support before reversing. Repeated closes or continued trading below the level would carry more bearish significance than a momentary sweep. What Bitcoin traders may consider watching Different traders may use these levels in different ways, at their own discretion: Short-term breakout confirmation: Watch whether BTC can break above $63,175 and successfully retest it, with $63,247-$63,270 providing the next validation area. Support-zone reaction: If BTC returns to $62,380-$62,535, watch whether buyers defend it again or whether selling begins to hold below the zone. Broader recovery confirmation: Treat $64,000-$64,095 as the decisive recovery test instead of assuming that every bounce from $63,000 marks a durable bottom. Because Bitcoin trades continuously, weekend conditions can sometimes involve thinner liquidity and less reliable breakouts. Confirmation through time, repeated closes or a successful retest may therefore be more useful than reacting to the first price spike. What should Bitcoin traders watch next? Bitcoin has defended the lower part of the previous month’s value area, but the rebound still needs to prove itself. The immediate challenge is to move beyond $63,175 and $63,270. The much larger test remains $64,000-$64,095. A successful reclaim would indicate that Bitcoin is returning toward the center of the previous month’s accepted value rather than merely bouncing from support. Until that happens, Bitcoin may be stabilizing, but it is not yet showing a fully confirmed bullish recovery. This analysis presents conditional market scenarios and opinions (not promises) at investingLive.com, not a guarantee of future performance. Traders should consider volatility, position size and their own risk limits before acting. This article was written by Itai Levitan at investinglive.com.

ForexliveSingle source
Newsletter

Track crypto & web3 every morning.

Daily digest tuned to this beat. The 5 stories most worth your time. Unsubscribe anytime.