SaaS & Software·Aug 9, 2026

Georgia police officers fired after Flock camera misuse

Article URL: Comments URL: Points: 13 # Comments: 4

Hacker News2 min readSingle source
Georgia police officers fired after Flock camera misuse
Image · Hacker News
The gist
5-point summary · 1 min

Article URL: Comments URL: Points: 13 # Comments: 4

  • SAVANNAH, Ga. (WTOC) - The Savannah Police Department terminated four sworn officers and two civilian employees following an internal investigation into misuse of the department’s Flock Safety License Plate Reader system.
  • Investigators found that employees were running searches on personal acquaintances and family members.
  • But the GBI’s criminal investigation is still ongoing, and SPD said it will keep cooperating fully.The names of the fired employees aren’t being released right now.
  • The city and SPD said that’s because of the ongoing GBI criminal investigation and an employee appeals process still underway.
  • They said more information will be made available when it’s legally permissible and won’t interfere with either process.Copyright 2026 WTOC.

SAVANNAH, Ga. (WTOC) - The Savannah Police Department terminated four sworn officers and two civilian employees following an internal investigation into misuse of the department’s Flock Safety License Plate Reader system. All six cases are also under independent criminal investigation by the Georgia Bureau of Investigation.The six employees were placed on administrative leave last week after a proactive review of system activity identified searches that appeared to have been conducted for purposes unrelated to legitimate law enforcement activity. SEE: Savannah Police investigating 6 employees over alleged misuse of license plate reader systemSPD started an internal investigation July 27 and referred all six cases to the GBI for independent criminal review.What the investigation foundSPD’s administrative investigation determined the employees violated department policies governing the authorized use of law enforcement technology and departmental resources. Investigators found that employees were running searches on personal acquaintances and family members. One officer was found to have given someone from an outside law enforcement agency access to SPD’s Flock Safety system, which they weren’t authorized to do.How the activity was detectedThe activity was identified through the departments auditing and oversight of the Flock Safety system, including use of the Flock Safety Audit Assist program, which became available in April.MORE: Savannah mayor, police chief feel ‘betrayed’ after 6 employees placed on leave for Flock camera misuseEvery search run through the Flock Safety platform is automatically logged — who ran it, when, and the reason they gave for doing it. SPD said they also have other safeguards in place, including mandatory training, role-based access controls and supervisory oversight.Oversight changes following investigationFollowing the findings, SPD implemented recurring weekly audits conducted by the Office of Professional Standards. Those reviews are designed to ensure compliance with department policy and identify irregular or potentially unauthorized activity.What comes nextThe internal investigation is wrapped up — the six employees have been terminated. But the GBI’s criminal investigation is still ongoing, and SPD said it will keep cooperating fully.The names of the fired employees aren’t being released right now. The city and SPD said that’s because of the ongoing GBI criminal investigation and an employee appeals process still underway. They said more information will be made available when it’s legally permissible and won’t interfere with either process.Copyright 2026 WTOC. All rights reserved.

Integrity note  ·  Xela does not rewrite or paraphrase article content. The excerpt above is the source publication's own words, sanitized for display. For the full piece — including any quotes, charts, or images — read it at Hacker News. Xela's rewritten version is off for this story, so there's no editorial angle attached — you're getting the source's reporting unfiltered. When the rewrite is on, we add a What this means block underneath with the operator/trader takeaway.

What people are saying

Discussion

Hot takes

0/280

Loading takes…

Comments

Discussion · 0

Sign in to comment, like, and save articles.

Sign in

Loading comments…

Keep readingSaaS & Software desk
See all in SaaS
Show HN: Lumabri – What if LLMs worked like Napster?
·

Show HN: Lumabri – What if LLMs worked like Napster?

A while ago I started working on Colibrì to see if it was possible to run huge LLMs on a normal computer. The project grew far beyond what I expected, thanks in large part to the HackerNews community. That led me to a new question: What if we stopped thinking about one computer? This is the idea behind Lumabri. Instead of requiring a single machine to store and run an entire huge model, Lumabri treats a network of normal computers as a shared pool of resources. One machine might provide disk space, another compute, another a different part of the model. If a required block or expert isn’t available locally, the system can retrieve or execute it on a peer. This is particularly interesting for Mixture-of-Experts models. A model can have hundreds of billions of parameters, while only a fraction are activated for each token. Rather than moving huge expert weights over the network, Lumabri can send the small activation to a peer that already has the expert and let it execute it. The goal is for machines to contribute whatever resources they can afford while using the swarm for the rest. The idea is very much inspired by peer-to-peer systems: users are the infrastructure. There are obviously major challenges, especially network latency and security. I’m experimenting with peer verification, SHA-256 verification, signed model state, replica selection, failover, and deterministic execution. Lumabri is still an early experiment. I don’t have a datacenter or a huge GPU cluster, so I’m building it with the hardware I have and trying to find out whether the idea actually makes sense. With Colibrì I asked: Can one normal computer run a huge LLM? With Lumabri I’m asking: What if many normal computers could become one huge computer? Feedback welcome. Repo: Comments URL: Points: 3 # Comments: 0

Hacker NewsSingle source
Newsletter

Track saas & software every morning.

Daily digest tuned to this beat. The 5 stories most worth your time. Unsubscribe anytime.