SaaS & Software·Aug 10, 2026

Japanese court overturns Red RAW video patent

Article URL: Comments URL: Points: 7 # Comments: 1

Hacker News2 min readSingle source
Japanese court overturns Red RAW video patent
Image · Hacker News
The gist
5-point summary · 1 min

Article URL: Comments URL: Points: 7 # Comments: 1

  • Japan’s patent court just invalidated one of the patents that stood in the way of Raw video’s adoption Red Published August 6, 2026 · Updated August 6, 2026 When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission.
  • The court determined that many of the claims made in the patent, first filed in the US in 2008, would have been obvious to someone skilled in the subject area and familiar with existing developments.
  • The news, first reported by Thom Hogan, put Nikon’s video subsidiary in the position of trying to defend a patent that Nikon had previously argued was invalid.
  • It’s difficult to know what the impact the rejection of this patent will be, given Canon, Panasonic, Sony and Blackmagic Design all now produce cameras with internal Raw video capture.
  • Searching for a camera led to him discovering DPReview and Richard was recruited by Phil Askey in 2007.
In this article

Japan’s patent court just invalidated one of the patents that stood in the way of Raw video’s adoption Red Published August 6, 2026 · Updated August 6, 2026 When you use DPReview links to buy products, the site may earn a commission. The Japanese Patent Office has declared one of Red’s key Raw video patents as invalid, following a challenge by Panasonic. The court determined that many of the claims made in the patent, first filed in the US in 2008, would have been obvious to someone skilled in the subject area and familiar with existing developments. The news, first reported by Thom Hogan, put Nikon’s video subsidiary in the position of trying to defend a patent that Nikon had previously argued was invalid. The patent itself describes a high-resolution video camera that compresses its Raw data, and appears to correspond to the patent at the center of historic claims against Sony and Apple and the almost inevitable counter-suits from those companies. We reported on many of these challenges, as well as Nikon’s, over the years. Nikon famously resolved the dispute by buying the company. Some of Red’s cinema camera and Raw knowledge has subsequently been applied to recent Nikon models. It’s difficult to know what the impact the rejection of this patent will be, given Canon, Panasonic, Sony and Blackmagic Design all now produce cameras with internal Raw video capture. One possibility the abolition of the license fees reportedly due to Red from users of Apple’s ProRes RAW codec. But given Red went from being privately held to being absorbed into Nikon, it’s difficult to get a sense for how significant these might be. And, of course, we shouldn’t assume even a minor cost reduction would necessarily get passed on to consumers. About the Author: Richard graduated as a scientist but had a lot more fun writing and shooting for his university magazine. A number of years spent variously as a reporter, writer and editor on science and engineering titles combined his knowledge of science with his interest in images and words. But it was spotting the connections between emission spectra, white balance and all the nonsense he’d taught himself playing around in Photoshop that helped kindle an interest in digital photography. Searching for a camera led to him discovering DPReview and Richard was recruited by Phil Askey in 2007. He’s been combining his love of photography, communication and attention to detail (pedantry?) ever since. He has unusually strong opinions about lenses for the APS-C format. Want to stay up to date on the latest product news and releases? Add DPReview as a preferred source to ensure our independent journalism makes it to the top of your Google search results.

Integrity note  ·  Xela does not rewrite or paraphrase article content. The excerpt above is the source publication's own words, sanitized for display. For the full piece — including any quotes, charts, or images — read it at Hacker News. Xela's rewritten version is off for this story, so there's no editorial angle attached — you're getting the source's reporting unfiltered. When the rewrite is on, we add a What this means block underneath with the operator/trader takeaway.

What people are saying

Discussion

Hot takes

0/280

Loading takes…

Comments

Discussion · 0

Sign in to comment, like, and save articles.

Sign in

Loading comments…

Keep readingSaaS & Software desk
See all in SaaS
Show HN: Lumabri – What if LLMs worked like Napster?
·

Show HN: Lumabri – What if LLMs worked like Napster?

A while ago I started working on Colibrì to see if it was possible to run huge LLMs on a normal computer. The project grew far beyond what I expected, thanks in large part to the HackerNews community. That led me to a new question: What if we stopped thinking about one computer? This is the idea behind Lumabri. Instead of requiring a single machine to store and run an entire huge model, Lumabri treats a network of normal computers as a shared pool of resources. One machine might provide disk space, another compute, another a different part of the model. If a required block or expert isn’t available locally, the system can retrieve or execute it on a peer. This is particularly interesting for Mixture-of-Experts models. A model can have hundreds of billions of parameters, while only a fraction are activated for each token. Rather than moving huge expert weights over the network, Lumabri can send the small activation to a peer that already has the expert and let it execute it. The goal is for machines to contribute whatever resources they can afford while using the swarm for the rest. The idea is very much inspired by peer-to-peer systems: users are the infrastructure. There are obviously major challenges, especially network latency and security. I’m experimenting with peer verification, SHA-256 verification, signed model state, replica selection, failover, and deterministic execution. Lumabri is still an early experiment. I don’t have a datacenter or a huge GPU cluster, so I’m building it with the hardware I have and trying to find out whether the idea actually makes sense. With Colibrì I asked: Can one normal computer run a huge LLM? With Lumabri I’m asking: What if many normal computers could become one huge computer? Feedback welcome. Repo: Comments URL: Points: 3 # Comments: 0

Hacker NewsSingle source
Newsletter

Track saas & software every morning.

Daily digest tuned to this beat. The 5 stories most worth your time. Unsubscribe anytime.