SaaS & Software·Jul 22, 2026

Why I'm building a note taking app without AI

When I talk to people about what I'm building, I give 'em the pitch on Docket being a note taking system specifically designed for regular meetings.Very commonly the first thing they reply with is something along the lines of: ah, so, with

Hacker News3 min readSingle source
Why I'm building a note taking app without AI
Image · Hacker News
The gist
5-point summary · 1 min

When I talk to people about what I'm building, I give 'em the pitch on Docket being a note taking system specifically designed for regular meetings.Very commonly the first thing they reply with is something along the lines of: ah, so, with

  • When I talk to people about what I'm building, I give 'em the pitch on Docket being a note taking system specifically designed for regular meetings.Very commonly the first thing they reply with is something along the lines of: ah, so, with AI right?No.
  • Taking (or not taking) actions with an inherent sense of their priority.I refer to this as active note taking.
  • It's a shift in mindset from thinking about taking notes in meetings as 'recording', which is a chore that ought to be handed off or automated, to actually distilling the few concentrated points of actual interest out of an hour of talking.
  • It can take that note, for sure, but it can't separate it from the 50 other points that were made that aren't as important.
  • You're not a passive 'note taker' going through the motions in boring useless meetings.
In this article

When I talk to people about what I'm building, I give 'em the pitch on Docket being a note taking system specifically designed for regular meetings.Very commonly the first thing they reply with is something along the lines of: ah, so, with AI right?No. Not with AI. No.What? But now I just have AI tools transcribe all my calls and take summaries. I haven't written notes in months.Good for you, but you're not who I'm building Docket for.I'm building Docket for people like me who want to actually use their own brain to distill important notes out of interactions in meetings and find a lot of value in doing so. Writing notes yourself as a driver for distilling what's important. For remembering what matters, in what can often be a lot of noise, filler, and formality. Taking (or not taking) actions with an inherent sense of their priority.I refer to this as active note taking. It's a shift in mindset from thinking about taking notes in meetings as 'recording', which is a chore that ought to be handed off or automated, to actually distilling the few concentrated points of actual interest out of an hour of talking. Not only is this something you do not want to hand off, it's something that you can uniquely do, that you want to do, and is in a large sense the apex of the value you create for your company as a professional and smart person.This only gets more true the more senior you get. You will notice this when you look around the room in a meeting with very experienced senior people in it. very often, they don't talk a lot, and when they do what they say is of immense value. What they've been doing is distilling, in their head, everything that's going on in this meeting, drawn out the one or two points of maximum value, and then shared those.Active note taking is about either being that person, and actually writing down those points so they are not lost in the ether, or being in the room and knowing when you hear them from that you should write them down.An AI can't really do that. It can take that note, for sure, but it can't separate it from the 50 other points that were made that aren't as important. But more importantly what it can't do is crystallise that point in your head. Once you're out of that room for a couple of hours, doing other things, try going back to the notes the AI took where those points are interlaced with others of varying value and remembering, out of that context, what the actual important things were.Active note taking is, in itself, a process for distilling and cystallising in your mind what is important at the point when you have maximum context. If you do it later, the value of the process drops off almost entirely.So that's entirely what Docket is built around, and is why, no, it is not an AI note taker. There's a lot of companies building tools that do that. You probably know people at work who are keen on using them. You probably also have a sense of the value those notes end up providing. And you know that's not what you want, or need, or indeed are going to do. You're a live player, a professional, using your skills and intelligence that AI will never replicate (being as it is, a midslop generator) in real time to provide unique value to your company. You're not a passive 'note taker' going through the motions in boring useless meetings. You're driving them.

Integrity note  ·  Xela does not rewrite or paraphrase article content. The excerpt above is the source publication's own words, sanitized for display. For the full piece — including any quotes, charts, or images — read it at Hacker News. Xela's rewritten version is off for this story, so there's no editorial angle attached — you're getting the source's reporting unfiltered. When the rewrite is on, we add a What this means block underneath with the operator/trader takeaway.

What people are saying

Discussion

Hot takes

0/280

Loading takes…

Comments

Discussion · 0

Sign in to comment, like, and save articles.

Sign in

Loading comments…

Keep readingSaaS & Software desk
See all in SaaS
Show HN: ValuePair – a friendship app that cares about values first
·

Show HN: ValuePair – a friendship app that cares about values first

Hey, I would like to show you my project, but it's difficult because it only works with a registration, so I explain the concept to you. The Idea: Everyone who registers has to do an onboarding and answer meaningful questions that help you to find a right match. The matching happens by the system. Once you're done with the onboarding, you enter the pool. When a match is found, you go into a 1on1 14 question-set with that person. All answers are revealed immediately. At the end both decide if they form a connection or not. Only if both agree, the chat opens. Once a connection is formed, they can play through other prepared question sets, so the conversation doesn't get dry. It's also possible to create custom question sets to play through with your connected matches. I just got this idea because I really wanted away from all the typical friendship and dating apps that are just a marketplace of user profiles. I feel like that's the only hook other apps offer, people come back because they are bored and browse through profiles. On tinder it's swiping through pictures and on other apps it's a list of profiles where you can filter with your matching criteria. But all that felt just shallow to me. I think people rarely ask the right questions each other, like really mandatory things that matter to form a any kind of relationship with someone. I've been on multiple different social platforms and it always felt mega shallow. Most people can't even start a good conversation, it's often just stuck at small talk. Maybe it's not even peoples fault, that's why I tried with these question sets to tackle multiple problems. First, that you don't even have to bother with someone if you have entirely different worldviews, which you would normally just find out if you talk long enough with someone. And second, just killing the small talk issue, by giving people a base. So before I started coding this project, I actually did a research if there is anything backed by science to find out, which kind of questions would actually matter to find out, if you can handle someone. There were a lot of studies I've found e.g. "Aron and colleagues (1997)", "Hall (2019)", "Byrne (1971)", "Finkel and colleagues (2012)" and "Hazan and Shaver (1987)". I took their research work and tried to create questions based on them. The project is running on Next, Postgresql, everything dockerized, running on a small Hetzner VPS. I used Claude+Codex to develop everything, but I wouldn't say it's really vibecoded, since I work as a Senior Dev and I used my main tech stack. It's an open beta currently and it's live for like 14 days - I have ~150 users right now. And honestly, I am really overwhelmed by those numbers, because it's the first time that I ever managed to attract this amount of people on a project I've launched. When I started, I launched it as a closed beta, so it was invite only. During that period I got so much good feedback from people, it was incredible. I implemented almost everything my first users told me. Since all the changes, I didn't retrieve any further feedback what people wish would be different. It's just constant good feedback since then. People contact me from alone and just tell me how much they like these questions and the loop. My marketing strategy is mainly Reddit currently, but I started also new methods. I found some super relevant subreddits that had no rules against advertising. When I wrote my posts on reddit, I didn't mention a product name or link. I've only described the idea and if somebody would have interest trying it out. That worked surprisingly well. Another thing I've done was using a social app that allows anonymous posts at your current location, kinda something like "Nextdoor". Posts on this app bring me daily 1-5 new registrations. I wonder what you guys think about it and I am open for any critics! Comments URL: Points: 3 # Comments: 2

Hacker NewsSingle source
Newsletter

Track saas & software every morning.

Daily digest tuned to this beat. The 5 stories most worth your time. Unsubscribe anytime.